Other blogs and websites have provided exceptional analyses of the Bishops' statement complying with Connecticut law requiring them to offer chemical abortions in their hospitals. Most importantly, First Things, the most influential American catholic magazine read by officials at the Vatican, had this incredible letter written by Connecticut professor Mike Augros, respectfully and humbly asking "why?" Human Life International also has a consise rebuttal to the Bishops statement. The National Catholic Register released an editorial today analyzing what happened in 2006 vs. 2007, a la my last post. Great minds think alike, what can I say. (Hi Tom.)
Another notable website is The American Papist, which provides a chronological rundown of post-statement, Plan B events, and thorough, intelligent analyses. Fallout from the Bishop's decision is reaching a creshendo in the blogosphere. Where do we go from here? I would oppose any petitions or paid advertisements. That is so Voice of the Faithful and Call to Action. Personal letters to the bishops letting them know of your prayers and your child-like questioning of their decision, must be done, even if they are never opened. Pope Benedict would like to hear from you too. His e-mail address is benedictxvi@vatican.va.
The "freepers" over at FreeRepublic.com have a lively discussion of Bishop Lori's blog post regarding Plan B. Who would have thought?
9 comments:
That Augros guy looks more credible than the guy in the striped shirt, so I'm going with him.
And guess what? the NC Register has something to say- and it makes me boil.
Could the people of Connecticut Have Done More?
Oops! Did I post that in the politcally incorrect place?
Not sure what happened with your other comments...I've checked with She Said and neither of us deleted them...
That's ok, I just pressed "publish' one time too many! Sorry it was so messy!
Can you comment on Fr. Kearns' opinion?
All can be
привет, Эта тема просто бесподобна :) , мне очень нравится )))
Post a Comment